Free diagnostic
AI Citation Readiness Score
Score a piece of content against the 8 structural signals that determine whether AI platforms can extract and cite it. Answer honestly based on what's actually on the page.
0 of 8 answered
The 8 criteria
Result
Answer all 8 questions to see your score, tier, and priority fixes.
How this score helps you get cited by AI
AI platforms don't rank content the way Google does. They extract and cite based on structure: whether a query gets a direct, quotable answer, whether headings match how people actually ask questions, and whether claims stand alone without needing several paragraphs of context. This assessment scores your content against the 8 structural signals that most consistently predict citation.
Score honestly. Every criterion includes the actual distinguishing detail between a 5 and a 1, not just a vague good-or-bad scale. The value of this diagnostic depends entirely on rating what's actually on the page, not what you intended to write.
This is a self-assessment using the same 8-criterion rubric behind a full content audit, not an automated scan. It won't catch everything a line-by-line audit would, quoted examples, a competitive citation-neighbor analysis, specific rewrite suggestions, but it will tell you honestly which signal is weakest and where to start.
Understand which AI visibility signal is your weakest and fix it
A self-assessment tells you where the structure breaks. It can't quote the sentence that fails, show you what a citable version reads like, or tell you which competitor is being cited in your place. That's what the full audit does, on the same 8-criterion rubric.
AI citation readiness FAQs
What is AEO or GEO, and how is it different from SEO?
Generative engine optimization (GEO), also called answer engine optimization (AEO), is the practice of structuring content so AI platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews can extract and cite it in response to a query. It overlaps significantly with traditional SEO, but optimizes for extraction and citation rather than search ranking position.
Is this score the same as running a full content audit?
No. This is a self-scored diagnostic using the same 8-criterion rubric behind a full audit, but a full audit reads the actual content line by line, quotes specific failures, and produces rewrite examples. Use this to identify which of the 8 signals is weakest before investing time in a deeper audit or a rewrite.
Which of the 8 criteria matters most?
Direct answer positioning, question-aligned headings, and structured extractability, specifically FAQ sections, are the signals AI platforms weight most heavily, since they determine whether content can be pulled cleanly without the model needing to interpret or reconstruct the argument. Fix these first if the score is low across multiple criteria.
Can a page score well on SEO but poorly on this rubric?
Yes, and it's common. A page can hold a strong Google ranking through domain authority and backlinks while still failing to get cited by AI platforms, because ranking and extraction measure different things. A well-ranking page with paragraph-long answers, topic-label headings, and no FAQ section will often lose the AI citation to a lower-ranking page that's simply easier to extract from.
How often should I re-run this assessment?
Re-score a page any time you materially restructure it, and periodically for your highest-traffic pages, since AI platforms re-crawl and update citations faster than traditional search rankings shift. A page that scores well today can lose ground if a competitor publishes better-structured content on the same topic.